CSEC ON-LINE REFERENCE LIBRARY |
ELLA W. HOAG, CSD
Now so long as one believes in and indulges evil, there must always be united therewith the consciousness that sometime its ultimate destruction must occur, and hence sin indulged always includes fear of condemnation. Then each mortal can readily see that he is the arbiter of his own sense of condemnation. With the willingness to condemn sin, he need no longer indulge it, and without indulgence there is nothing left to be condemned. In Science and Health (p. 392) we read, "Only while fear or sin remains can it bring forth death." Mortals must admit the necessity of condemning sin before they can be freed from it. A lack of right mental condemnation of sin results in blindness to it, and thus one becomes its victim. A willingness, on the other hand, to recognize and condemn whatever is unlike God, can only be brought about as one accepts and learns to understand and demonstrate the perfect premise of the allness of God, good, and the consequent nothingness of His opposite. Right condemnation of sin, then, is the acknowledgment and proof, of sin's utter unreality and undesirability, of its complete nothingness. As one therefore begins to let this law of God hold sway in his own thinking, he sees that it is also the law of deliverance from and annihilation of all sense of sin. Before Christian Science was revealed, Christians were tossed back and forth in their struggles to overcome sin in themselves and others. They were confronted with the dilemma which, while holding sin as real and pleasurable, at the same time constantly condemned men for sinning. Still, desiring to save the sinner, the sin was most often condoned, thereby frequently producing a worse sinner. As has been already stated, to be free from condemnation one must be free from that which deserves condemnation. John says, "If our own heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God." All the teaching of the schools has never shown men how to attain a heart free from condemnation. All efforts to attain personal goodness can never result in freedom, for from the ordinary theological standpoint of perpetually contemplating sin, it alone seems real and true, and therefore the greater the attempt to rid one's self of sin the greater the state of self-condemnation. In considering sin as a reality there has always been the endeavor to separate the sinner from his sin. This, however, is an utter impossibility; for, as our Leader tells us in "Retrospection and Introspection" (p. 64): "You cannot separate sin from the sinner, nor the sinner from his sin. The sin is the sinner, and vice versa, for such is the unity of evil; and together both sinner and sin will be destroyed by the supremacy of good. This, however, does not annihilate man, for to efface sin, alias the sinner, brings to light, makes apparent, the real man, even God's 'image and likeness.'" Christian Science gives us the perfect way, the way which blesses all and harms no one. It teaches us to separate both the sinner and his sin from our thought of the real man, whom we can always behold in Science as perfect, harmonious, holy, even as God made him in the beginning and as He has always maintained him and will always maintain him throughout eternity. To do this demands constant watchfulness and prayer that one may continually rise above all sin in his own thinking and living. We therefore learn in Christian Science that as we recognize what right condemnation really is, we can go fearlessly forward. Always awake to the condemning of sin in our own thinking, we thank God for the wisdom of Mrs. Eddy when she tells us in Miscellany (p. 249), "You may condemn evil in the abstract without harming any one or your own moral sense, but condemn persons seldom, if ever." This is the way finally out of all condemnation.
Christian Science Sentinel, January 17, 1920 |
Copyright
© 1996-2011 CSEC